My marriage has about as much chance of surviving as Hillary Clinton does of getting the Democratic nomination. That is, very very little. All the number-crunchers and pundits agree that she can't mathematically secure enough of the popular vote or pledged delegates to catch up to Obama. The Pennsylvania primary last week was not a chance for her to win the nomination, but simply to keep her head above water. If she won, her campaign would continue, but still with little chance of succeeding. If she lost, it would have been over.
My marriage has its own Pennsylvania primary moment.
Ever since I witnessed my wife joining the church last month, where I was sickened by her hypocrisy of pledging herself to the church the same week that she moved out of our home, I have been in email contact with some leaders of the church about how disappointed I was with the church's role in our marriage. This email "dialog" has been positive, but one of the things that has come out of it is that the wife has apparently been giving them a very different account of our separation than I have.
So a few weeks ago some people got together and decided that the best way to iron out these discrepancies would be to get me and the wife in the same room together along with the pastor. Since I have been critical of the church for "enabling" the wife to leave me, they are now getting serious about holding the wife accountable to her vows. It may be too little, too late, but at least they're making an effort.
The person trying to arrange this told me that the wife was initially open to such a meeting, but then changed her mind (going from "yes" to "depends" to "no" in the course of a week.) The wife is afraid that I will show my anger toward her, and she doesn't want to deal with that. Of course, that sentiment makes me angry. Wanting to avoid the anger of someone you've wronged is not a legitimate (Christian) excuse for getting out of something. It seems that the wife wants all the love and support that comes with joining the church, but none of the responsibility.
They are still trying to convince her to attend the meeting, and asked me for an "agenda" to help convince her. I'm not sure how helpful my "agenda" will be. What I really want is for the wife to acknowledge that her actions over the past three months have not been consistent with the "good Christian" she claims she wants to be. (Giving up on your marriage so easily, putting the moves on other men, and misleading members of the church, for example.) I want her to stop denying that her commitment to her marriage has nothing to do with her commitment to the church.
I don't expect this meeting to get us back together. I'm still too hurt, betrayed, and angry to want her back, and she certainly hasn't given any indication that she wants to come back. Like the Clinton analogy, all this meeting could do is probably stave off the inevitable. But, if our relationship has ANY chance of working out, this meeting must take place. And the wife HAS to sincerely acknowledge her mistakes. (I don't expect her to beg for my forgiveness, only to admit that her behavior, and the way she left me, was not appropriate.) That one act would go a long way toward dissolving my anger. I think a meeting under the authority of the church would provide the best chance of that happening. Otherwise, it's really over.
It's a long shot, but I have to try, especially after I criticized the church about their role in this. For my own closure, I have to put forth the effort.
Peace At Any Price
1 year ago
